Free tool no account Experimental

AI review summary: what assistants tell your buyer about your reviews

Reviewscope shows the AI review summary your buyer hears: what ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini say about your brand's reviews, platform by platform, with every rating marked as an unchecked claim and the invented ones flagged.

Three assistants, three ways of asking. Their claims, kept apart from platform facts.

Before a buyer opens G2 they ask an assistant. Reviewscope puts three questions to each of three assistants — one naming no platform, one naming all twelve, one naming three platforms we invented — and shows what came back, including the ratings they made up.

A free allowance per visitor, no account needed.

This tool reports the AI review summary assistants give. It does not report your real rating.

Every rating on this page is a claim from an AI assistant and may be inaccurate, incomplete or invented.

Questions

What is an AI review summary?
It is what an assistant answers when somebody asks about a brand's reviews: a few platform names, sometimes a score, condensed from whatever the model absorbed in training. Reviewscope does not write one and does not summarise your reviews. It records the AI review summary that ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini give about your brand, and marks which parts of it are unchecked claims and which are invented.
Why not just read my G2 or Capterra rating directly?
Because those numbers are not ours to take. Capterra, GetApp, Software Advice and Gartner Peer Insights publish no API and their terms forbid scraping; TrustRadius's API is for the vendor being reviewed; Clutch and GoodFirms hand out widgets to the profile owner. Trustpilot and G2 both have programmes that need an agreement nobody has signed on our side. So the tool measures the layer we can measure honestly — the assistant — and says plainly which platforms are unreadable and why.
How do you know a platform an assistant named does not exist?
Three lists and one hard condition. A name is checked against the twelve platforms we ask about, then against a list of real review sites we do not ask about, then against a list of things that are not review platforms at all — Reddit, an analyst house, a search engine. What survives all three is only reported when it arrived with a rating attached and sat where a platform sits in the sentence. A name with no number beside it is never called invented.
Is a rating an assistant remembers my real rating?
No, and the page will not let itself be read that way. An assistant is repeating a number from training data of unknown age, or producing one that fits the shape of an answer. Even when it happens to be right we cannot show that it is right, so the number stays inside a quotation with the assistant's name on it.
Is a run free of charge?
Yes, and no account is needed: each visitor has a small allowance of probes per time window. Nine questions go out — three to each of three assistants — and they go out together, so a run takes about as long as one question. A brand somebody read this week is replayed from the stored reading, dated, and does not use your allowance.

How to use Reviewscope

  1. 1
    Name a brand or website
    A company name or its domain. A domain also lets us read the rating the brand states itself.
  2. 2
    Compare each AI review summary
    See what each assistant says about your reviews, kept separate from platform facts.
  3. 3
    Use the tabs and the filter
    Switch between unprompted, when asked and invented. Toggle numerical claims only.

Why ask an assistant about reviews at all

A buyer comparing tools used to open two review sites and read. Now a growing share of them asks an assistant first, and what they hear is an AI review summary rather than the reviews: a platform name, sometimes a score, delivered in the same confident register as everything else. Whether that summary resembles your reputation is a question about the assistant, not about the platform.

That question splits three ways, which is why this tool asks each assistant three times. Without a platform named, an assistant reveals which sources it reaches for on its own — the ones that will reach your buyer unprompted. With every platform named, it reveals how willing it is to produce a number it does not have. With three platforms we invented, it shows whether it will rate a place that is not there — the clearest finding here, and the one we can prove rather than report.

None of the three is a rating source, and this page never pretends otherwise. What a platform actually scores you is on that platform, and it belongs to them. What an assistant says you score is a different fact about a different system — and it is the one your buyer meets first.

Who it is for

  • Marketing and brand teams who need to know which AI review summary a buyer hears before reaching a review site — and whether any of it is invented.
  • Whoever runs a review programme on G2, Capterra or Trustpilot and has to decide which platforms the assistants actually repeat.
  • Founders and support leads handed a screenshot of an assistant quoting a rating nobody recognises, who need to know whether it is a habit of the assistant or a fact about them.

To see whether the assistants name your brand at all, start one step earlier with Brandscope. Every free tool, in the order they are meant to be used, is on the free tools page.

How to read the three questions

Each tab reads the AI review summary from a different angle, and none of them answers what your rating is.

Unprompted
Which platforms an assistant names with no prompting. A platform cited by all three is part of your reputation whether or not you maintain a profile there; a platform cited by none is one your buyer will not hear about from an assistant.
When asked
What each assistant claims once every platform is named to it. Read the count under the column before the cells: an assistant that produced eleven numbers out of twelve has told you more about itself than about you.
Invented
A score attached to a platform that does not exist: one of the three we invented and named in the question, or one an assistant produced on its own. One of these makes every other number in that assistant's column a claim to discount — and unlike everything else on the page, it is a thing we established rather than repeated.

What this tool will not do

  • It never states a rating for your brand, and it writes no AI review summary of its own. Not an average, not a best guess, not a figure gathered from the assistants and presented as yours.
  • It reads no platform's own numbers. G2's, Capterra's, Trustpilot's and the rest are theirs, and taking them would break their terms — so every number here is an assistant's sentence, shown as one.
  • It calls one thing false: a rating for a platform that does not exist. Everything else an assistant said is shown unchecked, and labelled unchecked.
  • It reports what it covered. Twelve platforms, three invented ones, three assistants, nine questions — and when a list is cut, the count of what was left out is on the screen.

The same questions, out loud

Spoken

How people actually ask this, and what the honest answer is.

Why is ChatGPT telling people we have a rating on a site we have never used?

Because a named platform invites a plausible number, and a plausible number is what you get. Run the probe: if the same assistant also produces a score for a platform that does not exist, you are looking at a habit rather than a fact about you, and that is the thing to say when somebody forwards you the screenshot.

A customer sent a screenshot of an assistant quoting a rating nobody recognises.
Which review site should we actually invest in?

Start from the unprompted table rather than from the platform's sales deck. A site all three assistants reach for on their own is already reaching your buyer; a site none of them mentions may still be worth a profile, but it will not be what an assistant repeats.

Deciding where a limited reviews budget goes this quarter.
Our rating is good. Why does the assistant sound lukewarm?

The two are not connected as tightly as they feel. An assistant's AI review summary comes from what it absorbed, not from today's average, and it may not name your best platform at all. The unprompted table shows which sources it is drawing on, which is where a good rating has to be before it can be repeated.

A strong score on one platform and a flat answer from the assistant.

Words on this page

Hallucination
A confident statement a model produces that has no source behind it. A rating for a review platform that does not exist is the cleanest example there is: the shape of the answer is right and the referent is missing.
Brand mention
An assistant naming a company in an answer. Counted here per platform rather than per answer, because being named beside G2 and being named beside a site nobody has heard of are different facts.
AI visibility
How much of what an assistant says about a market includes you. Reputation is one slice of it — the AI review summary, which a buyer reaches last before deciding.

On this topic

What do models believe about our brand?

Every day Competitor comparison, answer by answer. How the product works

Other free AI search tools