seo-content
Technical SEOagricidaniel/claude-seoskills.sh ↗
Installs
5,565
deduplicated, at the last sync
Since we started
+3.4%
38 readings, about 2 hours apart. Not a live curve.
Our category
Technical SEO
ours
Last read
Sep 3, 2026
from the directory
Our brief
oursThis skill analyzes the quality of web content by assessing its adherence to Google's guidelines, focusing on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and helpfulness signals. It provides a comprehensive audit that includes word count analysis, readability checks, keyword optimization review, and readiness for AI search engines.
- Content Quality Score: XX/100
- E-E-A-T Breakdown
- AI Citation Readiness: XX/100
- Issues Found
- Recommendations
- [url]
not detected
The evidence does not contain any information regarding required paid plans or API usage.
not detected
The evidence does not mention any requirement for user registration to use the skill.
The skill's scores are described as heuristics and are not Google's internal ranking signals. It cannot guarantee rankings, nor can it access Google's internal ranking data. The analysis is based on its own scoring model, which weights Trustworthiness most heavily.
Evidenceskills/seo-content/SKILL.md:1-210
--- name: seo-content description: > Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit". user-invocable: true argument-hint: "[url]" license: MIT metadata: author: AgriciDaniel version: "2.2.5" category: seo --- # Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis ## Google's "Who / How / Why" Test (canonical heuristic) Before scoring E-E-A-T sub-factors, every page audit should pass Google's own three-question heuristic from the helpful-content guide: | Question | What to look for | |---|---| | **Who** created it? | Visible byline, author bio page, professional credentials. Required where readers expect it; non-negotiable for YMYL. | | **How** was it created? | Process disclosure where readers would reasonably ask, especially for AI-assisted content. Original research / first-hand evidence / lived experience. | | **Why** does it exist? | "To help people" rather than "to attract search clicks." Watch for niche entry without expertise, content churn for freshness signals, content written to a word-count target. | Primary source: https
Read 1 of 1 text files in the skill.
Installfrom the directory
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seoInstalling happens there, not here. We are an index with an opinion, not a mirror.
What is inside itfrom the directory
2 files — names only. The directory does not report sizes.
What the auditors foundfrom the directory
A skill is instructions your agent will follow and scripts it may run, so who checked it matters as much as how many people installed it.
Installs, reading by readingours
Axis starts at 5.4k, not zero — the range is 5.4k to 5.6k.
Asked out loudspoken, not typed
The same skill in the words people use speaking to an assistant rather than typing into a box. Each one carries the situation it came from, and each answer says only what the skill's own files support.
The provided documentation does not specify any paid requirements or costs associated with using the skill.
It performs a detailed audit covering E-E-A-T, readability, keyword optimization, and AI citation readiness. It also checks for helpfulness signals like original research and author credentials.